By: Sari
Being in a cohort of about 20
people, there are constant conversations about what is occurring in multiple
classrooms in the southeast region of Louisiana. Often reading, writing, and
mathematics are the majority of conversations while science and social studies
are looked over. This has also been apparent in my three placements over the
last 18 months.
My ongoing question is “Why has science become overlooked in
early childhood classrooms?”
I have been concerned by the lack
of exploration in science and the reliance on worksheets in early childhood
classrooms. The literature suggests traditional, text-based instruction, rather
than hands-on kinesthetic instruction, is not successful for teaching science
because the students are often involved in limited ways as “passive recipients”
of knowledge (Trundle, 2008, p.3). For the students to be able to obtain rich
information, they must be learning through first hand experiences.
According to Worth, inquiry-based
science’s core is based on direct exploration of phenomena and materials (2010,
para. 9). Often classrooms allow for minimal exploration and observation from
students. There will be some object placed on a table surrounded by
observations tools for the students to use, but the observations and questions
from the students go unnoticed (Worth, 2010). There are times when students are
not able to present their concerns or questions because of the quick rush onto
the next subject area that may be considered “more important” depending on the
school. Young children should be learning science through first hand
exploration. They should be involved in “sciencing” rather than learning the
facts presented by instructors and worksheets
(Kilmer & Hofman, 1995; Mayesky, 1998; Zeece, 1999). According to
Wilson, this can best be accomplished through the constructivist approach, in
which children use and explore, ask questions, and are presented with high
order thinking questions by their teacher. Productive questions are in fact,
one of the most effective tools for supporting constructivist learning
(Martens, 1999).
When teachers are guiding an
inquiry-based approach, it allows for “scaffolding of new scientific concepts
with the learner’s existing mental models” (Trundle et al., in press,
p.3). This is the type of learning that
children were born to engage in. They need to be touching things, moving around
the room, and attempting to figure out why something is the way it is. The
students become “active agents” in their learning and become motivated because
they have a special ownership of their understandings. This type of approach also leads to
collaboration among students, scaffolding through peer discussion, and
connections to the students daily lives (Trundle, 2009).
References
Trundle, K. (2008).
Teaching Science During the Early Childhood Years. Retrieved October 27, 2015,
from
http://ngl.cengage.com/assets/downloads/ngsci_pro0000000028/am_trundle_teach_sci_early_child_scl22-0429a.pdf
Wilson, R. (2008). Earlychildhood NEWS -
Article Reading Center. Retrieved October 26, 2015.
Worth, K. (2010). Science in Early Childhood
Classrooms: Content and Process. Retrieved November 1, 2015.


